<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cranky pixels &#187; christopher eccleston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crankypixels.com/tag/christopher-eccleston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crankypixels.com</link>
	<description>for best results, add coffee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:36:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>substance is in the eye of the beholder</title>
		<link>http://www.crankypixels.com/2009/substance-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crankypixels.com/2009/substance-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[catch-all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher eccleston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david tennant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fandom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cranky-mama.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;which I realize now is not a good title, as &#8216;substance&#8217; can go either way there. Whatevs. I stand by it (though at a safe distance). I have nothing to say tonight, so I don&#8217;t know why I am posting. Except, obviously, to provide a public service to my adoring, er, public. (Note to self: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;which I realize now is not a good title, as &#8216;substance&#8217; can go either way there. Whatevs. I stand by it (though at a safe distance).</p>
<p>I have nothing to say tonight, so I don&#8217;t know why I am posting. Except, obviously, to provide a public service to my adoring, er, public. (Note to self: invest in thesaurus.)</p>
<p>So instead of content, I bring you: listicle. You can thank me later.</p>
<p><em>6 (fannish) things (sort of) about me</em> </p>
<ol>
<li>My high-school boyfriend (the first one, or possibly the second, or possibly both) tried to get me into Doctor Who, but despite the undeniable magnificence of Tom Baker&#8217;s neckwear, I found it rather meh. I was, however, secretly into The Prisoner, so one can&#8217;t argue that I was opposed to British sci fi. Though possibly one could make the argument that I was opposed to British sci fi with bad teeth. </li>
<li>Not So and I started watching New Who about a year ago, because&#8230;I don&#8217;t remember why, and from the first episode I was hooked. It didn&#8217;t hurt that Christopher Eccleston comes across as completely insane as well as so <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=woobie">woobie</a> I can barely stand it. Seriously. That man, with those eyes. I have never seen an actor telegraph emotion so effectively before in my life. Don&#8217;t believe me? Watch the video for <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap88Nvq44uQ">I Am Kloot</a> and tell me you aren&#8217;t just completely fucking blown away. Go ahead. I will wait.</li>
<li>So, predictably, I despised David Tennant in the role of the Doctor until the last 2 episodes of Season 2. The very mention of Mme. de Pompadour causes me to break out in hives. And Tennant&#8217;s Doctor, though apparently more true to Doctors of yesteryear, at least according to Not So, was way too frenetic and bouncy and <i>not Christopher Eccleston</i> for my taste.</li>
<li>Then he <i>finally</i> went all woobie (yay!) and I started scrawling &#8220;Doctor + Rose 4ever&#8221; in the margins of my notebooks. (Not really. I don&#8217;t have notebooks.) Plus David Tennant has very nice eyes, if you like that sort of thing, and rather entertaining hair as well. And&#8230;what&#8217;s this? Scottish accent? <i>Scottish accent?</i></li>
<li>Don&#8217;t tell anyone, but Not So has eyes like David Tennant, with the chocolate brown and the come-hither and the swoon-inducing. You are all very jealous of me now. I do not blame you.</li>
<li>I am (again, predictably) unsure about the New Guy, though the Confidential he did in which he waves his hands around like a crazy person goes a long way to assuage my fears.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crankypixels.com/2009/substance-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

